Healthcare is the debate have room for greed?

Tuesday, November 2, 2010

Unless you have been kept in isolation for the past six months, it is known that the administration has taken the challenge of improving our health care system. The goal is to reduce costs, offer health insurance to everyone in the country and to improve the quality of care.

How did you hear the noise (I would like to debate, dialogue, discussion or) you would think that the argument is that Obama's plan takes the average person. Butcontrol bit 'of history on your neighbor who drives "clay" to give a second thought.

There are 3,300 health care lobbyists who are as active participants in the process of rapprochement with the Congress members registered. There are 435 deputies and 100 senators in Congress. For example, the number of lobbyists, congressmen six to one. Almost all these lobbying firms and organizations that lose something if our current health care system starts cuttingunnecessary costs.

If you pay for current health care system. So I think you want to listen to this version of what it is. After all, if you spend less money and better health care, you (and me) to win!

Under the current system, there are a lot of administrative work to ensure that / is documented for each patient had. may be the reasons for these cards to provide data for improving care in the future. Or it can be the back coverhospitals and doctors from lawsuits. But those who have seen the bills, went from a hospital stay, how much paperwork "necessary" in the current system.

The current health system also requires evidence beyond the patient's diagnosis and monitoring its response to treatment. There is evidence of a jury because the doctor knows about the patient's condition and to offer convincing support for the decision on medical treatment services. Who needsthese tests? Sometimes the doctor orders more tests, sometimes it is the policy to require the hospital for tests. After all, if a hospital has a laboratory that wants its employees. If a hospital is just the latest MRI is installed, you will pay for it.

We can compare what happens to our health care system, what happens in our banking system. Banks have found a way to lend money to anyone "fog mirror" could in order to buy a house. Then the mutualare grouped into a package not identified financial "instruments" sold to investors. The people who work out of this house including manufacturers, benefits brokers, building supply stores, manufacturers and distributors of furniture, landscaping, house-flippers, etc. There was also a team of lawyers assembled in loan agreements, codes construction and responsibilities. I forgot, the banks and investors. None of them were shouting "Stop this madness!" The price of houses continued to go up,Driven by the demand, until the bubble burst.

In health care, doctors and hospitals a way to charge what they think you need to find to stay in business. They indicate the cost of insurance as the main cost factor. However, the final rule insurance authority, which, although they actually charged doctors and suppliers, or negotiate for the office of the medical professional liability. In return, they collect the premiums for insured andMoney they have in other ways until it is necessary to invest. In this system, the physician who prepares billing invoices for the assurance process, from patient to deal separately with the insurance company. This is similar to the way that mortgage companies have been separated from the ultimate financial contract for each loan. People who come from hospitals, doctors, drug manufacturers and instruments used in medical treatment, the manufacturer of UseLaboratory tests and equipment, and the advertising industry, the pharmaceutical industry supported. I would also stress the enormous business (and profit), this represents insurance companies and lawyers.

If we threaten the physician is to provide our health care system to keep terminated, he or she simply buy more professional liability that covers the effects of possible actions and increase taxes to cover rising costs. The lawyers and insurancebe to win this game. But not everyone is counting on the whistle to blow that part of the problem. Pharmaceutical companies and that is a product of the responsibility for health insurance purchase is used to cover their risk. This is a part of public health, which is a big business and has not spoken.

Another part of the problem is our belief that we can save money on every medical test known to man in the pursuit of our lives are justified - at the cost of our insurance, of course. As more recentexpensive tests and drugs find their way onto the market, we feel entitled, who have provided us. If this is a reasonable expectation of a complex debate is all alone.

At the outbreak of the health care of the bubble, and what she looks like? Will the government save doctors and hospitals? Can the government then step in the basic rules for the provision of thousands of billions of dollars Place a Bail-out? We should not wait until then to have a voice in changing the system. Wechose the senators and representatives to speak for us in this matter. But they are 6-1 in series of lobbyists who are out to save the jobs of all concerned to work for a pharmaceutical company, hospital or in an advertising agency to make money in today's health care system. Ordinary citizens than the lobbyist. Call, write, and e-mail your congressmen and senators to tell them what you want from our new health care system. Think about what you're talking about. Your statement, we get thetheir needs. And talk. It 'important than money and health that will be decided in this discussion.

0 comments:

Post a Comment

 
 
 
 
Copyright © Kellogg mba